W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-cvs@w3.org > July 2013

[Bug 22559] Selecting the Preset XHTML5 + SVG 1.1 + MathML 3.0 + RDFa 1.1 + ITS 2.0 reports warnings about RDFa Lite 1.1

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:06:44 +0000
To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22559-169-PwSOwIleNN@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |mike@w3.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Selecting this preset should disable the RDFa Lite Warnings, but it does not.

Thanks for the report. I broke it accidentally when I added ITS 2.0 support
recently, but I've undone the breakage now. So please try it again now at
http://validator.w3.org/nu/ and if it's not working as expected please let me

> Also, I don't really think RDFa Lite 1.1 should be the default configuration
> for HTML5 nor for XHTML5 when validating.  There is just too much
> functionality outside of Lite.

The existing RDFa support in the Nu validator was added relatively recently and
I'd really rather we give some more time for people to actually use it and give
feedback before we change the defaults in mid-stream.

> Moreover the RDFa generated by ReSpec is not "Lite".

As far as I know ReSpec doesn't generate RDFa by default.

And about the RDFa-included output that ReSpec does generate, I'd wonder if the
fact it's generating non-Lite RDFa might because that RDFa support was added to
ReSpec before there ever was a RDFa Lite (since RDFa Lite only came along

So I'd think that along with whatever options ReSpec provides for generating
RDFa-included output, it could provide one more user option for generating that
as RDFa Lite, alongside whatever the current option is that's hard-coded to
only generate full RDFa.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 14:06:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:17:55 UTC