- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:31:49 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10174 --- Comment #8 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> 2011-10-29 18:31:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > So should we consider always having the validator gzip the request? > > I suppose that would be a good workaround for now unless there is a fix for the > HTML5 backend side in sight. Let me know if you plan to look into the HTML5 > validator further in the coming few days or if you'd like me to apply the > workaround to validator now (I plan to tag a new validator release really > soon). I've pinged Henri about it, so let's at least wait until we hear back from him. In the mean time, I have looked at it myself, but so far what I've found is what I noted in comment #7 -- that the problem does not occur for the non-gzipped case if I use the --data switch with curl instead of the --data-binary switch. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 18:31:52 UTC