- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:26:45 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10174 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> 2011-10-29 13:26:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > So should we consider always having the validator gzip the request? I suppose that would be a good workaround for now unless there is a fix for the HTML5 backend side in sight. Let me know if you plan to look into the HTML5 validator further in the coming few days or if you'd like me to apply the workaround to validator now (I plan to tag a new validator release really soon). Not gzipping the request has the benefit that it makes things easier to debug with tools such as wireshark, and I suppose it has some small performance benefits when traffic to the HTML5 validator goes over a very fast network connection such as a loopback interface. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 13:26:51 UTC