- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:32:28 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6091
Summary: Using the 'accept=' url append option returns invalid
reusable link.
Product: Validator
Version: HEAD
Platform: PC
URL: http://wolflinux.homelinux.org/bug/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Website
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: taylor.gresser@gmail.com
QAContact: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
In short, the "Linking to this result" for my php/xhtml code should return:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwolflinux.homelinux.org%2Fbug%2F&accept=application%2Fxhtml%2Bxml;
but instead returns:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwolflinux.homelinux.org%2Fbug%2Faccept=application%2Fxhtml%2Bxml;
(missing an '&' before "accept=")
Long version:
I use the following code at the top of each page on my site:
<?php
if(stristr($_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],"application/xhtml+xml")){
header("Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=UTF-8");
echo('<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">');
} else {
header("Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8");
echo ('<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">');
}
?>
This requires me to append "&accept=application%2Fxhtml%2Bxml" to the end of
the normal validation string when I want to test xhtml 1.1 validation, and I
can leave it off to test xhtml 1.0 strict.
When the validation completes, it returns a link in the "Linking to this
result" section to allow easy re-validation. This link leaves out the '&'
character, resulting in it attempting to validate the page
"http://wolflinux.homelinux.org/bug/accept=application%2Fxhtml%2Bxml", which
does not exist.
I'm filing this report on the assumption that this is not the desired behavior.
If it is, my apologies.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 22:33:03 UTC