- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:16:28 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6298 Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ot@w3.org --- Comment #2 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2008-12-17 15:16:27 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Or you could list both HTML5 and XHTML5 in the "Document Type" list. I thought of doing that indeed. That'd work. I got mixed message as to whether it is a good idea to use the “XHTML5” name however, as far as I can tell it's unclear what the best name is. Any pointer to what the currently accepted best term is? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:16:38 UTC