W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-cvs@w3.org > September 2007

[Bug 5001] XMLNS should not be needed for XHTML *TRANSITIONAL* only for *STRICT*

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:55:24 +0000
To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IS0Ds-0003mO-MT@wiggum.w3.org>


ot@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

------- Comment #1 from ot@w3.org  2007-09-03 00:55 -------
is not for "XHTML strict" but for "strict conformance to XHTML" (whichever
profile). The wording is confusing, but the need for a namespace comes from the
XML nature of XHTML, whether it's the strict, transitional or frameset doctype.
Received on Monday, 3 September 2007 00:55:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:54:59 GMT