- From: Olivier Thereaux via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:59:09 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/perl/modules/W3C/LinkChecker/docs
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv26345
Modified Files:
checklink.html
Log Message:
the checklink documentation states:
[[
Please send comments, suggestions and bug reports about the link checker to the www-validator mailing list (archives), with 'checklink' in the subject.
]] -- http://validator.w3.org/docs/checklink.html#csb
To some it's fairly obvious that the subject should "include" checklink, but we receive so many messages titled "checklink:" that a few examples of good and bad feedback wouldn't hurt...
Index: checklink.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/perl/modules/W3C/LinkChecker/docs/checklink.html,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -d -r1.39 -r1.40
--- checklink.html 13 Sep 2007 16:38:23 -0000 1.39
+++ checklink.html 28 Nov 2007 02:59:07 -0000 1.40
@@ -268,9 +268,18 @@
Please send comments, suggestions and bug reports about the link checker
to the <a href="mailto:www-validator@w3.org?subject=checklink%3A%20">www-validator mailing list</a>
(<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/">archives</a>),
- with 'checklink' in the subject.
+ with 'checklink' in the subject. See examples below
</p>
+ <dl>
+ <dt>Good</dt>
+ <dd>Subject: online checklink times out when accessed with Iceweasel 2.1.12</dd>
+ <dt>Bad</dt>
+ <dd>Subject: checklink</dd>
+ <dt>Bad</dt>
+ <dd>Subject: checklink does not work</dd>
+ </dl>
+
<h3><a name="issues" id="issues">Known issues</a></h3>
<p>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 02:59:19 UTC