http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=152 ot@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|plh@w3.org |dave.null@w3.org ------- Comment #2 from ot@w3.org 2007-07-19 09:09 ------- Related discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2007Jul/0016.html «should be easy to add. The hard part is to determine if we html or css was submitted. In Unicorn, we do that using a dropdown list of mimetypes, but here it should be possible to guess the type from the content» When using upload, we would also have a media type. So the absence of media type would only be a proble for "direct input". There, heuristics to guess whether the content is CSS or HTML might be a tad tricky (think of the cases where people put html-style comments in CSS stylesheets...) but feasible.Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 09:09:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:33:19 GMT