http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4515 ------- Comment #2 from jrowens.w3@ghiapet.homeip.net 2007-08-11 18:48 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The validator uses CSS2.1 as a default profile, and CSS2.1 does not include > text-shadow (for lack of implementation). If you wish to validate against the > CSS2 profile, use the options - but you are rather encouraged to validate > against CSS2.1, which is closer to the current state of implementations of CSS > on the Web. > Could it at least be fixed so that where it links to "text-shadow" in the error text, it doesn't link to the CSS2 page on it, which makes it look perfectly legitimate? Even when I validate against CSS2.1 specifically, it still links to the CSS2 text-shadow property. (Oddly, when I validate as CSS3, it accepts text-shadow.) Perhaps there's a page explaining why text-shadow was dropped that could be linked to instead?Received on Saturday, 11 August 2007 18:48:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:33:19 GMT