[Bug 1833] Wrong ISO-8859-1 enconding behaviour on "Direct input"

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1833





------- Additional Comments From ot@w3.org  2005-10-20 21:18 -------
(In reply to comment #10)

> The issue is that the form as it is now would indicate that there are three alternatives to validating your 
> code.  But these alternatives are NO LONGER EQUIVALENT.

Yes, they are...

In addition to the good answer Bjoern made, there is one thing I want to point out: the recent changes are 
here *precisely* to make the behaviour equivalent for the end user. Whether the internal processing is 
different is none of the user's concern.

Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 21:18:11 UTC