Re: CSS3 Validation Service - @keyframes and animation

Hi Jasdeep Khasla,

browser specific prefixes are not part of the CSS specifications, so not 
accepting them is fine.

And let me say that w3schools has absolute no connection to W3C, 
specially w3school IS NOT W3C. They only serve some tutorials i think, 
so not referring to w3schools is always a good idea.

Greetings
Andreas


Am 09.09.2012 10:05, schrieb Jasdeep Khalsa:
> Dear CSS Validator Team,
>
> Firstly, I wanted to thank you for creating such a fantastic service 
> and for your continued dedication to standards on the web!
>
> I have been trying to check the conformity of some CSS3 stylesheets 
> and I believe the W3C CSS validator must be a little out of date since 
> using valid mark-up for the CSS3 animation property returns "Property 
> animation doesn't exist" even though it is implemented in Firefox 5+, 
> Chrome, Safari and Opera with -moz-, -webkit-, -webkit- and -o- 
> prefixed respectively.
>
> Similarly, using valid markup for the @keyframes property returns 
> "Sorry, the at-rule @keyframes is not implemented." even though it is 
> implemented in Firefox 4+, Chrome, Safari and Opera with -moz-, 
> -webkit-, -webkit- and -o- prefixed respectively.
>
> My point of reference has been the W3C Schools website: 
> http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_browsersupport.asp and I have 
> tested working examples of animation and @keyframes in Chrome and Firefox.
>
> Kind regards and looking forward to hearing from you,
>
> Jasdeep HBS Khalsa
> -- 
> f: facebook.com/Sikher 
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Sikher-Project/140058112709857> | 
> t: twitter.com/Sikher <http://twitter.com/sikher>
> Search Guru Granth Sahib <http://www.sikher.com/guru-granth-sahib/> in 
> 54 languages
>
> <http://www.sikher.com/>
>