- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:51:07 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
- cc: Thomas Gambet <tgambet@w3.org>, www-validator-css@w3.org, Cyrille Moureaux <cyrille@google.com>
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Jens O. Meiert wrote:
As a followup to the mailing list...
Cyrille sent us a patch that was integrated. The result is available on
the dev validator at http://qa-dev.w3.org:8001/css-validator/
Thanks again Cyrille and Jens !
> (+Cyrille Moureaux)
>
> Thomas, everyone interested in the subject,
>
>>>> Why wouldn?t a warning, clearly stating that ?vendor-specific
>>>> extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic
>>>> correctness?, mean a viable alternative?
>>
>> That said, several people in the W3C team agree with your position and
>> if you come up with a patch we'll be happy to review it
>
> great news: thanks to Cyrille we do have a patch for the CSS validator
> available that would throw a warning (?Property foo is an unknown
> vendor extension?) instead of an error when encountering
> vendor-specific extensions.
>
> What is the suggested/preferred process now to test and include this
> in the live version of the CSS validator? (The W3C might just contact
> Cyrille and me?j9t at google dot com?directly to coordinate.)
>
>
> Thank you,
> Jens.
>
>
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:51:09 UTC