On 2010-06-28, at 12:04 AM, Jens O. Meiert wrote: > Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific > extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic > correctness”, mean a viable alternative? From my perspective it does, > and means a win for everyone involved. Given how, lately at least, vendor-prefixed extensions seem to be used mostly as a cross-compatibility tool and very rarely for proprietary extensions, this looks like a good idea indeed. -- olivierReceived on Friday, 2 July 2010 12:10:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:26 GMT