W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Contradictory validation reports

From: Kravvitz <Kravvitz.css-validator@dynamicsitesolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:29:12 -0400
Message-ID: <12b1d2060907141329v1cdd764ch4a6f473695efc6ae@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl Limpert <karl.limpert@employmentlawclinic.com>
Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
The error isn't in the stylesheet. It's in an inline style -- the
style attribute of the <div> in the <form>. You need to remove the
newline that's in the middle of the "border-top" property name.

-- Kravvitz


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Karl
Limpert<karl.limpert@employmentlawclinic.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Iíve been working on a new website recently, and continue to aspire to keep
> it W3 compliant. However, while my CSS file is confirmed as valid when I
> upload it from the PC, as soon as I host this for the site & follow the CSS
> validation button, it declares an error. Iíve attached PDF prints of both
> pages, but the CSS is the exact same, and simply copied from the PC as soon
> as it is validated.
>
>
>
> At the moment the CSS validation badge is on a page not indexed or listed
> elsewhere (http://employmentlawclinic.com/ppma/searches/) although this is
> only a temporary address while bugs are worked out , so it may move soon.
> Iíd like to keep the CSS badge, but would appreciate understanding why my
> CSS is declared valid when submitted from one address (the PC) while not
> from another (the hosting site).
>
>
>
> Hope this is a bug with the Validation service, as Iíve worked hard to try
> to keep to the standards, but would appreciate any feedback you can offer..
>
>
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Karl Limpert
>
> Consultant/Advocate
>
> Employment Law Clinic
>
>
>
> Phone: 020 3239 0569
>
>
>
> This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of Employment Law Clinic.
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you
> must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to
> anyone.
>
>
>
> Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
>
>
>
> This original of this email, and any attachments, has been scanned for
> viruses before leaving Employment Law Clinic.
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 20:37:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:24 GMT