W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > January 2007

RE: CSS3 Paged Media properties

From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:58:48 -0600
Message-ID: <78A3602ADF54BA4EAB53F378BF55588B9FDFDC@G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
To: "CSS validator list" <www-validator-css@w3.org>


 > I have forwarded your message to the CSS validator list, I 
> believe you sent it to the markup validator list by mistake. 

Doh!  Thanks.

> I have already 
> asked the WG if there was any interest in helping maintain 
> the profiles of specifications being worked on by the group 
> (css2.1, css3) but I have not yet received any substantially 
> positive answer from the group. If I am not mistaken, you are 
> part of the group, would you like to get the topic on its agenda?

Yes, will do.  Unfortunately, I expect there will be a dearth of
positive responses, either because of lack of the necessary development
expertise or lack of bandwidth.  I myself suffer from both. ;-)  But
maybe toward the end of the year...

Thanks for your help.

Best wishes,

Melinda


> -----Original Message-----
> From: olivier Thereaux [mailto:ot@w3.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:46 PM
> To: Grant, Melinda
> Cc: CSS validator list
> Subject: Re: CSS3 Paged Media properties
> 
> Hello Melinda,
> 

> I am setting the reply-to to the former, please follow-up on 
> the css validator's list.
> 
> On Jan 13, 2007, at 08:36 , Grant, Melinda wrote:
> >  I have submitted other defects regarding lack of support for paged 
> > media properties, margin-box props as I recall, but have 
> received no 
> > response.  Is this an acknowledged defect, and if so, are 
> there plans 
> > to support these properties?
> 
> I am only marginally aware of this css3 module, but it is 
> very likely that the css3 profile of the validator is not up 
> to date.  
> Unfortunately at this time, the resources dedicated to the 
> css validator, either staffed or volunteer, are too little to 
> properly follow css specifications currently in development, 
> as they are moving targets for us - we mostly work on bugs 
> regarding mature specs and usability.
> 
> Keeping the validator up to date with moving specs would 
> however be an easier job for people involved in developing 
> them, i.e, members of the CSS working group. I have already 
> asked the WG if there was any interest in helping maintain 
> the profiles of specifications being worked on by the group 
> (css2.1, css3) but I have not yet received any substantially 
> positive answer from the group. If I am not mistaken, you are 
> part of the group, would you like to get the topic on its agenda?
> 
> Thank you,
> olivier
> --
> olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/ 
> W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 22:59:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:18 GMT