Re: background-color not validating when it should

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:50:14AM -0500, Robert Mullaney wrote:
> I realize it is a warning and not an error. Since it is perfectly valid code
> according to the specification, why even raise the warning? 

Since, despite being valid, it can cause problems, and the CSS
validator also provides a few linting functions.

> Especially when it's a warning saying "background-color not
> specified" when it has been.

Transparent is not a colour, it is the explicit absence of one.

-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk

Received on Sunday, 19 November 2006 10:40:45 UTC