- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:30:49 +0000
- To: CSS validator list <www-validator-css@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:15:06PM +0900, olivier Thereaux wrote: > The CSS working group considers that CSS2.1 includes errata for > CSS2, and as such, stylesheets that are invalid when checking > against 2.1 are invalid CSS2. Only for features which are common to both (according to http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-19980512-errata.html ). Since font-size-adjust is not common to both, that it is missing from CSS 2.1 isn't considered errata. Additionally, it states that "While CSS 2.1 is still a Working Draft, the errata are to be considered proposed errata." (and it is still a working draft). ... but I only raised the point as a lead in to the main problem. > Could you add this to bugzilla? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 > The validator only links to one spec, and for now indeed it is CSS2. > However, I agree that it should be changed to 2.1 eventually, and I > added the following issue to bugzilla earlier today: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 Great, thanks. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 12:31:01 UTC