W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > September 2005

RE: RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response...

From: Burtin Hart <beh@atac.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:35:36 -0700
Message-ID: <003c01c5ba24$46e37d30$a755b240@atac.com>
To: "'David Dorward'" <david@dorward.me.uk>
Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>

Thank you.

Obviously the statement needs to be amended to inform the reader that it is
merely a note about what's a "best practice."

-----Original Message-----
From: David Dorward [mailto:david@dorward.me.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:28 AM
To: Burtin Hart
Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
Subject: RE: RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response...

On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:10 -0700, Burtin Hart wrote:
> No error or warning found
> To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document 
> parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML.

It means exactly what it says - you should use valid HTML.

> I also tested my HTML and got no errors or warnings (image attached).

It *doesn't* say that you HTML is not valid. Just that you should check that
it isn't.

David Dorward                           <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
                             -- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:39:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:16 GMT