- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:58:43 +0300 (EEST)
- To: Matt LaPlante <mcd@cyberdogtech.com>
- Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Matt LaPlante wrote: > I don't see what needs to be interpreted. I can reference a document as > follows, for example: > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#background-properties You are referencing a document that itself says: "This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress." That's part of my point. A second part is that the draft defines what it means to say that a user agent conforms to the proposed specification, but it does not define the conformance of style sheets. -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 06:59:02 UTC