I was hoping you could help me clear up a problem I'm having validating a URL. The W3C Markup Validation Service passes the markup as valid Xhtml transitional, but when I use the W3C CSS Validation service it reports that I should validate the XML document first. The CSS report say that: Element type "img" must be followed by either attribute specifications, ">" or "/>". Which makes no sense to me because the img element in question IS followed both by attributes AND "/>". Also, the img tag is virtually identical to other tags which HAVE been passed. This leads me to deduce that there could be a bug somewhere, as there is a conflict of "opinion." Can you help?Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 04:58:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:16 GMT