W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Vendor Specific Extensions

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:30:24 +0100
To: "Christian Roth" <roth@visualclick.de>
Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Message-ID: <vf3bq1linu7f8p6n574vfaq7tlrsv2pq90@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Christian Roth wrote:
>So is using proprietary extensions in a way specified e.g. in CSS 2.1
>making the stylesheet an invalid CSS stylesheet? Or is it merely making
>it just an invalid CSS 2.1 (or CSS 3, 1, 42) stylesheet?

There is no specification for what is a "valid CSS stylesheet", there
are only specifications for what is e.g. a "valid CSS 2.1 stylesheet".

>Does the validator have a mode that allows checking against a certain
>level/revision combination *plus* allowing proprietary extensions
>(checking their syntax only, of course)? Which profile do I use for that?

No. I also note that there aren't so many specifications for proprietary
extensions that would actually allow telling whether a specific syntax
is allowed or not, at least it would be difficult and error prone.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 16:30:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:16 GMT