W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > July 2003

differences between upload / uri

From: <benoit.ganne@parabolereunion.com>
Date: 25 Jul 2003 11:26:17 -0400
Message-ID: <2038D3B60219D411ABA100508BC27B47812E78@PRSERVER>
To: www-validator-css@w3.org




Hi everybody,
it seems that there are some differencies between the "URI" css-validator
and the "upload" css-validator.

For example, try to check your own css :
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/style/general.css
If you check it "by URI", the css-validator will declare that it's a valid
css, but display some warnings.
If you check it "by upload", the css-validator will only display the same
warnings (and don't say at any time that it's a valid css).

I have the same probleme with my own css, and it's a bit confusing... Is my
css valid or not ??

So please, decide which css is valid or not, because these css valid and not
valid are quite strange.

Benoît GANNE.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 11:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:12 GMT