W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Additional valid CSS?

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: 25 Mar 2002 18:19:20 -0500
To: www-validator-css@w3.org
Cc: William BC Crandall <crandall@wiesbaden.vistec.net>
Message-Id: <1017098361.12042.184.camel@jfouffa>
> Greetings,
> 
> First, thanks very much for the service. 
> 
> Second, I'm a little confused by the report, which reads
> (for an uploaded file):
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------
> No error or warning found
> 
> To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct 
> document parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML.
> 
> Valid CSS informations
> body {
> margin : 5px; 
> padding : 0; 
> color : black; 
> background : white; 
> font-family : "new century schoolbook", serif; 
> font-size : 14px; 
> } 
> h1 , h2 , h3 , h4 {
> font-family : "comic sans MS", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; 
> line-height : 120%; 
> } 
> h1 {
> font-size : 20px; 
> } 
> -------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1. Is "No error or warning found" the best I can hope for?
>    [The parallel html validator is a bit more enthusiastic ;) ]

Well, I can certainly add "Congratulations, William!" :-)

> 2. There is rather more css info than shown (see below).
>    Why does that material not appear?

The comments are removed in the output.

> 
> 3. My css (below) works fine with IE5, and seems valid
>    based on your tests, but current Mozilla and Netscape 
>    fail to recognize horizontal padding. Is that normal?

I don't know unfortunately. You can either ask your question on the
www-style@w3.org mailing list, look for pages that reference the
supported properties in those browsers, or ask Netscape/Mozilla directly
on their mailing lists.

Philippe
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 18:19:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:10 GMT