Re: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)

In the meantime, I just out that the tv: URI document is currently 
in the RFC editor queue
http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html

It should be issued as an informational/experimental RFC soon.

Philipp Hoschka a écrit :
> 
> Dan,
> 
> this may be an issue: I can't find the draft on the list of
> things the IESG is currently working on
> http://www.ietf.org/IESG/status.html
> 
> You may want to go back and check that things didn't get lost
> somewhere.
> 
> -Philipp
> 
> Dan Zigmond a écrit :
> >
> > Philipp,
> >
> > Yes, I did forward the current "tv:" spec to the IESG shortly after my last
> > posting.  So they are working on it.
> >
> > If we have some consensus around "lid:" as well, I'll certainly forward that
> > too.
> >
> >         Dan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Dan Zigmond
> > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
> > WebTV Networks, Inc.
> > djz@corp.webtv.net
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 9:07 PM
> > To: Dan Zigmond
> > Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> > Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
> > forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
> > was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
> > time to wrap this up.
> >
> > -Philipp
> >
> > Dan Zigmond a écrit :
> > >
> > > Agreed.  We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also
> > > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts.
> > >
> > >         Dan
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > Dan Zigmond
> > > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
> > > WebTV Networks, Inc.
> > > djz@corp.webtv.net
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
> > > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> > > Subject: "lid" URLs
> > >
> > > (someone) wrote me:
> > >
> > > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to
> > a
> > > > URI scheme called lid:
> > > >
> > > >    draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
> > > >    draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
> > > >
> > > > I have two thoughts:
> > > >
> > > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
> > > >
> > > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs,
> > but
> > > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or
> > > > namespace identifier parts).
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics,
> > > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the
> > > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since
> > > it just adds confusion.
> > >
> > > Larry

Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2000 13:52:47 UTC