Re: TV Namespaces a response to "mike"

From: Craig A. Finseth (fin@finseth.com)
Date: Tue, Aug 31 1999

Next message: Craig A. Finseth: "Re: Next steps on draft-zigmond-tv-url-02"
Previous message: Craig A. Finseth: "Re: TV Glossary"
In reply to: allen mornington_west: "TV Namespaces a response to "mike""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:15:01 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199909010315.WAA28280@isis.visi.com>
From: "Craig A. Finseth" <fin@finseth.com>
To: amornington_west@compuserve.com
Cc: www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: TV Namespaces a response to  "mike"

   I suggested in an earlier response that a clear statement of the
   requirements is desirable.  It has not been the only suggestion.

Been there.  Done that.  See:

	http://www.w3.org/TV/TVWeb/TVWeb-URI-Requirements-19990311"

Craig

Next message: Craig A. Finseth: "Re: Next steps on draft-zigmond-tv-url-02"
Previous message: Craig A. Finseth: "Re: TV Glossary"
In reply to: allen mornington_west: "TV Namespaces a response to "mike""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]