DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)

From: Philipp Hoschka (ph@w3.org)
Date: Mon, Feb 22 1999

Next message: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Previous message: Adams, Glenn: "RE: ATVEF uri"
Next in thread: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Philipp Hoschka: "Re: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Philipp Hoschka: "Re: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Message-Id: <199902221746.SAA19519@www45.inria.fr>
To: "Adams, Glenn" <gadams@spyglass.com>
cc: www-tv@w3.org
From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:46:40 +0100
Subject: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri) 


On 22/02/1999, "Adams, Glenn" <gadams@spyglass.com>  wrote:

>By referencing DOM0, you are referencing IE/Navigator behavior that remains
>unspecified.  I agree that DOM1 is too much 

which parts are too much ?

Next message: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Previous message: Adams, Glenn: "RE: ATVEF uri"
Next in thread: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Adams, Glenn: "RE: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Philipp Hoschka: "Re: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Maybe reply: Philipp Hoschka: "Re: DOM (was: Re: ATVEF uri)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]