Re: one more requirement
From: Craig A. Finseth (fin@finseth.com)
Date: Mon, Jan 11 1999
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:34:33 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199901112034.OAA15600@isis.visi.com>
From: "Craig A. Finseth" <fin@finseth.com>
To: miked@tbt.com
Cc: www-tv@w3.org, Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr
Subject: Re: one more requirement
In the email I received, there were several people in favor of it, and one
that seemed generally open to it, but had many questions and wanted more
information before including it in the application scenarios. Can you tell
me who objected to its inclusion anywhere at all?
Gomer, in my recollection.
You have made a proposal to omit my proposal from the application scenarios
document, and infer that it should be omitted from the requirements document.
...
No, I said that its subject material was _appropriate_ for the
requirements document and hence for discussion.
My words were:
>In my opinion, it is not appropriate to add to the application
>examples document.
>
>As we are now in the process of reviewing the requirements document
>itself, it is appropriate for discussion in that context.
> ...
Craig