- From: Colin Perkins <C.Perkins@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 17:30:42 +0100
- To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
- cc: "Michael A. Dolan" <miked@tbt.com>, udlr@sophia.inria.fr, www-tv@w3.org (WWW TV List)
--> Jon Crowcroft writes: >In message <3.0.5.32.19990425161040.009df200@cts.com>, "Michael A. Dolan" typed > >>THE PROBLEM > >>----------- > >>In the carriage of IP over a broadcast link, there are several problems > >>that need to be addressed in order for multiple broadcasters and receiver > >>manufacturers to make use of the transport in any sane manner, and without > >>colliding on network address usage. > >fyi: >to some extent this issue is being discussed between the MPEG cttee >and the AVT WG (right, colin?) - the area of multiplexing (and >demuxing and associated I-Ds/addresses ) that differ between >for example DMIF and RTP Is a topic there..... To some extent, although this is at the level of multiplexing SL-packetised MPEG-4 elementary streams for efficient transport (reducing header overhead), rather than to address any lower level network address usage concerns. Colin
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 1999 12:31:04 UTC