Message-Id: <36599A65.7E6FC2CD@natlab.research.philips.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:24:53 +0100 From: Warner ten Kate <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D Craig A. Finseth wrote: > > Perhaps if we changed the requirement to read: > > o A URI should be resolvable under any of the following network > access conditions: > - TV Broadcast, same or another network > - Internet > > - Home/local storage and playback of TV broadcast content < > - Other (future) networks > > ? This permits common operations without expanding the scope too much. > If that removes your objections, fine with me. However, shouldn't we look to make this point more generally, e.g. in the Abstract ? I mean we are talking about URIs to access TV Broadcast content, aren't we ? What should we specify (in this context) about URIs accessing Web content ? Warner.