Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D

From: Craig A. Finseth (fin@finseth.com)
Date: Wed, Nov 18 1998

Next message: dean blackketter: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Previous message: Gomer Thomas: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
In reply to: Gomer Thomas: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Next in thread: dean blackketter: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:38:26 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199811182238.QAA04151@isis.visi.com>
From: "Craig A. Finseth" <fin@finseth.com>
To: gomer@lgerca.com
Cc: www-tv@w3.org, e-e@toocan.philabs.research.philips.com
Subject: Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D

Well said...

   I worry that we will come up with an excellent scheme which meets all
   needs for DTV, but objections will be raised that it does not meet this
   requirement, because it does not properly allow identification of
	...
Craig

Next message: dean blackketter: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Previous message: Gomer Thomas: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
In reply to: Gomer Thomas: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Next in thread: dean blackketter: "Re: E-E: Re: URL: Comments on TV URI reqs I-D"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]