AW: work on url for television started

From: Henning Timcke (henning.timcke@werft22.com)
Date: Fri, Oct 16 1998


Message-ID: <01BDF8F0.A9EF1760@marketing.aart.ch>
From: Henning Timcke <henning.timcke@werft22.com>
To: "'Simon Gibbs'" <simon@arch.sel.sony.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, "www-tv@w3.org" <www-tv@w3.org>
Cc: Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>, Rodger Lea <rodger@arch.sel.sony.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:35:13 +0200
Subject: AW: work on url for television started



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:	Simon Gibbs [SMTP:simon@arch.sel.sony.com]
Gesendet am:	Freitag, 16. Oktober 1998 01:00
An:	Larry Masinter; www-tv@w3.org
Cc:	Philipp Hoschka; Rodger Lea
Betreff:	Re: work on url for television started


[>]  Just as existing URLs can refer to local and remote
objects, so perhaps we should allow tv URLs to refer to local
and remote sources.
[>]  If this is not the case, you should not call it an xy UR*
The conceptual scenario you describe here works fine with absolute UR*'s (http://, file:///. etc) and relative UR* in *classic* I-Net architecture and topology.
Maybe I miss a point: do not hrsitate to tell me what are the reasons for your considerations.


Henning Timcke
Ideen Werft22 GmbH