Re: Some comments on the requirements

Hello Chris,

At 07:22 03/02/12 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:39:09 PM, Martin wrote:

>MD> At 20:50 03/02/04 +0100, Bert Bos wrote:
>
> >>11 Have a default UNICODE font
> >>
> >>     Is it really a requirement to have a standard font? What font
> >>     would that be? Arial? Maybe the intention was to require that the
> >>     format supports all Unicode characters, rather than a specific
> >>     font?
>
>MD> Requiring that the format supports all Unicode characters
>MD> would be pretty much obvious given the general Internationalization
>MD> policy at W3C, and not worth mentioning explicitly.
>
>That is, however, what previous discussion established was meant by
>that particular section.

Many thanks for your help. If this is what was meant, it definitely
should be worded more clearly.

Regards,    Martin.