> Masahiko Kaneko wrote: > Hi, > > XHTML+SMIL is one of the profiles supported by SMIL 2. If Timed Text is > designed to work in a modular way with SMIL 2 then it could easily be > added to XHTML+SMIL in the same way. > > Probably you don't want to have to define a new text definition markup > language, but rather leverage HTML/XHTML. Don't know if they leverage XHTML+SMIL they would have to support all of the features of the chosen modules or if the Timed-text WG could just pick the features out of the certain modules from XHTML+SMIL when creating a new language. An updated overview of the latest XHTML+SMIL profile: http://www.geocities.com/ramirez_j2001/xhtml-smil/xhtml-smil-jan02/index.htm > By the way, the W3C HTML working group just picked up the charter to > come out with an official XHTML+SMIL profile. When I first read that news, I was excited then I thought for a second, If the HTML WG recommends XHTML+SMIL and it only looks good Microsoft's IE, no more W3C web it'll be MSWeb. You don't want that to happen do you :) Jose Ramirez > http://www.w3.org/2002/05/html/charter > > Current version of XHTML+SMIL: > http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusSMIL/ > > Masahiko Kaneko >Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 11:05:10 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:42:28 EDT