W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 2008

Re: Fallback flow for /site-meta for top level domains

From: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:05:26 -0800
Message-ID: <60c552b80811301805g143bc1bcgf417b2afc744f864@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav <hueniverse@gmail.com>, www-talk@w3.org

I'm not quite following. How does this proposal stomp on people's namespace? 
If they want to serve different documents on the two domains (and can figure 
out how to do so), they can.

Also, the question isn't really whether _we_ think it's easy or not to point 
one to the other, but whether we think that a large number of registrars 
make it unintuitive for a large number of amateurs to do so.


On Nov 30, 2008 6:56 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

Absolutely not. the spec is already stomping on an authority's control over 
its namespace quite enough, and it's easy for people to work around this if 
their intent is for the two to be the same.

On 30/11/2008, at 8:55 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > (sorry for potential 
duplicates, I'm havin...
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 08:42:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:33:07 UTC