W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > July to August 2004

RE: 4xx responses for bad query strings?

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:12:20 +0200
To: "NESTING, DAVID M (SBCSI)" <dn3723@sbc.com>
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Message-Id: <1091542339.1416.220.camel@stratustier>
Le mar 03/08/2004 ŗ 16:04, NESTING, DAVID M (SBCSI) a ťcrit :
> In a future revision it might also be helpful to see a note disambiguating the definition of "resource" between the HTTP and URI RFCs, as the latter suggests the query string operates *on* the resource while in HTTP, the query string (also?) helps *identify* the resource.

FWIW, the on-going revision of the URI RFC (2396) does indeed
incorporate this change:
http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#query reads
"The query component contains non-hierarchical data that, along with
data in the path component, serves to identify a resource within the
scope of the URI's scheme and naming authority (if any)."

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 10:13:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:28 GMT