W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2002

Re: Relocating Web services

From: William F. Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:47:59 -0400
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: W3C Web Client/Server Standards Discussion <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <i7k7qu5xeo.fsf@pluto.math.albany.edu>
Mark --

> As Simon said, if a mistake has been made, I hope that we can all be big
> enough to admit it, learn from it, and move ahead with allowing the W3C
> to lead the Web to its full potential.
> The Process document is not static.  If it were, the W3C would have no
> AB, no TAG, and an IPR policy that would have spelled its demise long
> ago.  It evolves, because the W3C must evolve.

If I tell you that I think you're right, will you, wearing one of
your other hats, work to get that other crowd to agree that alongside
"application/xhtml+xml", we also ought to have
"text/html; profile=xhtml" for content providers who know how and when
to make it work?  :-)

                                    -- Bill
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 10:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:33:04 UTC