W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2002

RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)

From: Anne Thomas Manes <atm@systinet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:37:05 -0400
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Cc: <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CJEIKEMEBAONGDDNLEKFIEEIECAA.atm@systinet.com>
I wasn't involved in that decision. Systinet joined to participate in XML
Protocol.

So I ask again: if so many folks at W3C believe that Web Services has
nothing to do with the Web, why did W3C initiate the XML Protocol working
group with such a strict charter requiring that the work had to be based on
SOAP 1.1?

Anne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-talk-request@w3.org [mailto:www-talk-request@w3.org]On Behalf
> Of Simon St.Laurent
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:11 PM
> To: Anne Thomas Manes
> Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> Subject: RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)
>
>
> On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 17:24, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> > Limiting W3C's activities to only exploring REST is an unreasonable
> > constraint.
>
> And claiming that Web Services has anything at all to do with the Web is
> extraordinarily misleading marketing.  You've noted that yourself
> previously.
>
> Why exactly does this stuff belong at the W3C?
>
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
> Errors, errors, all fall down!
> http://simonstl.com
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 18:35:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:27 GMT