- From: <roconnor@Math.Berkeley.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:26:12 -0800 (PST)
- To: <www-talk@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> > Yes, URIs *may* denote abstract resources. No, HTTP URLs may *not*.
>
> Patrick, as an author of both of those specifications, I can
> definitively state that what you are saying does not match what I intended
> when I wrote the sections to which you have referred.
I must admit that I always thought that HTTP URIs were some retrivable
resouce, but after looking at the introduction to RFC 2068:
Practical information systems require more functionality than simple
retrieval, including search, front-end update, and annotation. HTTP
allows an open-ended set of methods that indicate the purpose of a
request.
It seems that Sean is right. HTTP URIs seem like they could mean
anything.
- --
Russell O'Connor roconnor@alumni.uwaterloo.ca
<http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/>
``This is not a time, as it is never a time, to seek vengeance, but a
time to seek the courage to forgive'' -- George W. Bush
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE79Gs3ZG3em5NXM14RAkbyAKDw6YfAKKSChm0+6mylR7gQZTRaxgCeIJby
eTwsI1ja68wbFsgxdFerimg=
=ruSG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 20:26:17 UTC