On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Ian Hickson wrote: > What is wrong with XHTML itself, though? Don't forget Appendix C is > non-normative! You're forgetting the conformance requirements. Besides the usual silliness with doctype declarations (see www-html, from late December 1999 into January 2000), there's a bunch of "musts" whose provenance is clearly a historically inherited notion of "compatibility". I'll repeat the references, and add one: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Jan/0255.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Jan/0246.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Feb/0000.html ArjunReceived on Monday, 25 June 2001 01:23:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:45 GMT