St.Laurent Simon <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote: >> Folks, please, let's not turn this into a bash-the-W3C session -- they get >> enough of that already. Instead, let's try and keep on-topic with >> constructive solutions about how the W3C can improve their openness, without >> sacrificing too much. > > Sorry Aaron, but if trust in the W3C is the fundamental issue at stake > here, openness is really only one aspect of the discussion. OK, but still, I think it would be more productive to come up with suggestions that reduce the need for "blind trust" or simply faith in the W3C to "do the right thing". I think openness is one of these ways. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:33:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:45 GMT