W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2001

Re: Signing Document and PICS

From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 01:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.32.0104080108120.8742-100000@blue1>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> >>> Also, the RDF data is useless to me without a digital signature.
> >>> PICS has
> >>> DSIG, where is the analogus thing for RDF?
> >> You'll want to use the Web-of-Trust's Assurance:
> > WOT doesn't seem to actually exist.
>
> It certainly does, look again:
>
> http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/

Thanks, I couldn't find this before fo some reason.

Um, I take it that wot is not related to the W3C.  How widely accepted is
this?  Should I consider doing my own thing?

(I also wasn't subscribed to this list for some reason.  Hopefully I'm
subscribed now.  I enjoyed reading Simon's posts in the archives.)

- -- 
Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
           <http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/>
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE60B4LZG3em5NXM14RAnNjAKCsCAMS4Aal7xC8118RWSegIi6OHgCg1qo7
pgC29Y7zpMFN/VP3MNNPoh0=
=yujW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 04:15:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:25 GMT