- From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <www-talk@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 02:28 PM 4/6/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >Which may answer some questions. If your document is an XHTML page, then you
> >can stick it in since it is safely in another namespace.
>
> Huh? XHTML doesn't permit simply "sticking in" content which "is safely in
> another namespace".
>
> Given the addition of another module which defines the dropped-in content
> (like RDDL does for its components), it's fine, but namespaces don't make
> anything happen 'safely' by themselves.
Section 7.7 of the RDF specfication says to drop RDF in the head of an
HTML document. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/>
I don't get it, the result isn't HTML. Why would the recommend such a
thing. It makes me feel sick to my stomach.
- --
Russell O'Connor roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
<http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/>
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6zl6DZG3em5NXM14RAuhvAKCXb9rDfHOxljF0N1EufApHv8UC/gCffiiR
juhfHjraSnZx9HO2RXlGXhQ=
=4150
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 6 April 2001 20:25:43 UTC