W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2001

Re: Signing Document and PICS

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 16:34:43 -0500
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, <www-talk@w3.org>
CC: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Message-ID: <B6F3A0A2.88E6%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote:

> It isn't safe, if only because making such claims seems to inspire
> significant violence around the right group of people.
> 
> And if you run those semi-XHTML documents through a validating XML 1.0
> parser, you've got big problems to deal with.

These days, it seems you've got problems to deal with running any XHTML
document (valid or not) through a validating XML 1.0 parser. You've got even
bigger problems running a namespace document through.

> I'd love to see processing models which permitted such 'safe' use of
> content in undeclared namespaces anywhere inside a document, but I think
> RELAX - which offers a 'divide and conquer' strategy (see
> http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1109) - is about the only thing at all
> resembling that kind of processing in a validating environment.

I can't say I'm an expert in validation, but I do know that RSS takes this
approach, and we have schemas in Schematron, Examplotron, RELAX (coming
soon), and a bunch more I can't remember. I'm sure other namespaced formats
do this and work too.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Friday, 6 April 2001 17:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:25 GMT