You might want to review the work going on in Content Negotiation (conneg) Working Group http://www.imc.org/ietf-medfree/ Al At 12:15 PM 2000-03-02 -0500, Tam Freestone-Bayes wrote: >Many sites and their users can benefit from the provision of more than one >http interface to a site - for example, the increasingly widespread >bandwidth discrepancy between standard modem and broadband connections may >encourage developers to produce both high- and low-bandwidth versions of a >site. > >Many sites implement this but rely on the user to manually select which site >they "prefer". > >If the site developer knew what the user's average download times were upon >their arrival, then this could be used to automatically determine what level >of information to display to the user before the first URL is actually >served. > >I suggest that a client side header (for example "Avg Speed: 38552" >representing bits per second, say, could be useful. It is the responsibility >of the client to calculate and maintain this figure based on their average >or maximum download speeds over the duration of a browsing session. > >The header should obviously remain optional in any client implementation, >but the benefit of supplying it is high. > >tam > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >Received on Thursday, 2 March 2000 19:54:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:43 GMT