Received: from nf4.netforward.com (nf4.netforward.com [204.57.67.249])
	by wallace.hotkey.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA23112
	for <god@hotkey.net.au>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 08:44:10 +1100 (EST)
X-Forwarder: NetForward.com
Received: from www19.w3.org (www19.w3.org [18.29.0.19]) by mozart.hotspace.net.au (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ia414708 for <ap@cyberjunkie.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 08:43:00 +1100
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) id QAA16875;
	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:43:00 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:43:00 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Message-Id: <199901252143.QAA16875@www19.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:42:27 -0500
From: "Kevin J. Dyer" <kdyer@draper.com>
In-reply-to: Ben Trafford <bent@dnai.com>
 <"Re: Microsoft Style Sheet Patent"@mb2.draper.com>
To: www-talk@w3.org
Reply-to: kdyer@draper.com
Message-id: <990125164228.ZM17984@triton.draper.com>
Organization: Draper Laboratory
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96.990125125140.4971B-100000@triton>
Subject: Re: Microsoft Style Sheet Patent
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <www-talk@w3.org> archive/latest/3897
X-Loop: www-talk@w3.org
Sender: www-talk-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: www-talk-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
Status:   

Thanks for using NetForward!
http://www.netforward.com
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v

> On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Robert Prichard wrote:
>
> Business as usual?:
>
>
>  US5860073: Style sheets for publishing system
>
>   Inventor(s):
>  Ferrel; Patrick J. , Seattle, WA
>  Gertz; Matthew W. , Redmond, WA
>  Meyer; Robert F. , Redmond, WA
>  Millet; Stephen J. , Seattle, WA
>  Schofield; Kevin M. , Bellevue, WA
>  Shewchuk; John P. , Seattle, WA
>  Smith; Walter W. , Seattle, WA
>
> 	Wow. The arrogance of this patent is mind-boggling. Why doesn't
> somebody forward this to the DoJ, or to the judge in charge of the trial,
> with a detailed explanation how intrinsically asisine and untrue this
> patent claim is?
[Snip Ben's std disclaimer]
>
>-- End of excerpt from Ben Trafford

How can they make any claim to enhancing or improving "current"
intellectual property when they barely understood the WWW delivery
mechanism and its importance 4 years ago?

--
=====================================================================
Kevin J. Dyer	 			     Draper Laboratory  MS 35
Email: <kdyer@draper.com>		     555 Tech. Sq.
Phone: 617-258-4962			     Cambridge, MA 02139
FAX: 617-258-2061
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 "No! No different! Only different in your mind.       - Master Yoda
   You must unlearn what you have learned."               The Empire
                                                         Strikes Back
=====================================================================

