Received: from nf6.Netforward.com (nf6.netforward.com [204.57.67.9]) by wallace.hotkey.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA10837 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:04:17 +1100 (EST) X-Forwarder: NetForward.com Received: from www19.w3.org (www19.w3.org [18.29.0.19]) by mozart.hotspace.net.au (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id aa415532 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:03:05 +1100 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) id FAA05759; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:03:02 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:03:02 -0500 (EST) Resent-Message-Id: <199901261003.FAA05759@www19.w3.org> Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990126100321.00d390f0@pop.rvc.co.uk> X-Sender: rvc01@pop.rvc.co.uk X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:03:22 +0000 To: www-talk@w3.org From: Igor Clark Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Microsoft Style Sheet Patent Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3899 X-Loop: www-talk@w3.org Sender: www-talk-request@w3.org Resent-Sender: www-talk-request@w3.org Precedence: list Status: Thanks for using NetForward! http://www.netforward.com v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Hi there At 05:03 PM 1/25/99 -0500, B.K. DeLong wrote: > Wow. The arrogance of this patent is mind-boggling. Why doesn't >somebody forward this to the DoJ, or to the judge in charge of the trial, >with a detailed explanation how intrinsically asisine and untrue this >patent claim is? The address to send it to is Microsoft.atr@usdoj.gov I'm assuming the DoJ is more likely to take notice of an American correspondent in a case such as this. If this isn't the case, or no-one fancies doing it, I'll give it a go ... Rgds Igor Clark ------------- Igor Clark --- Director, RVC Limited ------------- ---- Email: igor.clark@rvc.co.uk -- Mobile/SMS: 07771901628 ---- - T: +44 (0)171 4903320 F: +44 (0)171 4903327 W: www.rvc.co.uk -