- From: Kevin J. Dyer <kdyer@draper.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:42:27 -0500
- To: www-talk@w3.org
> On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Robert Prichard wrote:
>
> Business as usual?:
>
>
> US5860073: Style sheets for publishing system
>
> Inventor(s):
> Ferrel; Patrick J. , Seattle, WA
> Gertz; Matthew W. , Redmond, WA
> Meyer; Robert F. , Redmond, WA
> Millet; Stephen J. , Seattle, WA
> Schofield; Kevin M. , Bellevue, WA
> Shewchuk; John P. , Seattle, WA
> Smith; Walter W. , Seattle, WA
>
> Wow. The arrogance of this patent is mind-boggling. Why doesn't
> somebody forward this to the DoJ, or to the judge in charge of the trial,
> with a detailed explanation how intrinsically asisine and untrue this
> patent claim is?
[Snip Ben's std disclaimer]
>
>-- End of excerpt from Ben Trafford
How can they make any claim to enhancing or improving "current"
intellectual property when they barely understood the WWW delivery
mechanism and its importance 4 years ago?
--
=====================================================================
Kevin J. Dyer Draper Laboratory MS 35
Email: <kdyer@draper.com> 555 Tech. Sq.
Phone: 617-258-4962 Cambridge, MA 02139
FAX: 617-258-2061
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"No! No different! Only different in your mind. - Master Yoda
You must unlearn what you have learned." The Empire
Strikes Back
=====================================================================
Received on Monday, 25 January 1999 16:42:33 UTC