W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > January to February 1998

Re: Lang. in rfc1766

From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 10:03:02 -0500 (EST)
To: www-talk@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980220095951.24912B-100000@germain.math.uwaterloo.ca>
On <Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:32:16 -0500 (EST)>
   <roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> In rfc 1766 it uses example languages like en-cockney, az-arabic and
> az-cyrillic.  But these examples don't seem to be registered with the
> IANA.  As far as I can tell, the IANA has only registered 4 languages:
> 
> no-bok    Norwegian "Book language"
> no-nyn    Norwegian "New Norwegian"
> i-navajo  Navajo			
> i-mingo   Mingo
> 
> Are teh examples given above actually useable?  If so, where are they
> registered?

Just to clairify, by examples given above, I'm refering to en-cockney,
etc.  Are they usable?

-- 
Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
    <URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/>
"And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message"
-- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Friday, 20 February 1998 10:03:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:23 GMT