W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 1996

Re: Mirror Negotiation

From: Joel N. Weber II <nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:44:50 -1000 (HST)
To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
cc: Brian Morin <bmorin@WPI.EDU>, www-talk@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961209134050.29259C-100000@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Koen Holtman wrote:

> >Is there anything I'm overlooking?
> It is not easy for a client to quickly determine which mirror which offers
> the highest bandwidth.  A HTTP protocol element for sending a list of
> mirrors to the client only solves the easy part of the problem.
> I believe that there can already be some mirror negotiation when resolving a
> hostname to an IP address, but I don't know how effective that is.

Yes, I think that's the key problem.

The Linux mailing lists are distributed on different servers depending
on your domain name.  That helps, but it isn't perfect.

I have gotten mail that went from vger.rutgers.edu to nic.funet.fi
to koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us.  Someone must think that's an efficient
route if that's how it's configured, but I don't see the logic there.

OTOH, most users don't know what's optimal either, and time the user
spends picking a server is a ridiculous waste of a user's time.

Maybe proxies do a better job solving this if you design the proxy network
correctly.  In other words, for the most efficient possible performance,
there would be a proxy server in the iolani.honolulu.hi.us domain, another
one at mhpcc.com, etc.  Right now there's just a proxy for Iolani which
sends the request directly to the server.

<nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>                    <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
"...For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."  -- Mathew 9:13
Received on Monday, 9 December 1996 18:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:59 UTC