W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 1996

Re: HTTP header suggestion/request

From: Rens Troost <rens@name.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 12:03:48 -0500
Message-Id: <199611101703.MAA29202@engine.name.net>
To: kdyer@draper.com
cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, www-talk@w3.org, koen@win.tue.nl, megazone@livingston.com, rens@century.com, sdorner@qualcomm.com
>     Note: only the file name should be sent and not the entire path.

Correct; this is specified in 1806, since it's a security

>     Once the user acknowledges the file name and location, the UA creates the
>     correct file-type and local file requirements on the users behalf.
>   + The UAs I have tried will ignore Content-Disposition if the Content-Type
>     is anything other than application/octet-stream.

Better documentation/standards track status will hasten adoption.

> Most of my work has been option 1, especially for files which are used in
> a collaborative environment.  Although we are moving into option 2 for
> larger files and tarred packages.

Mainly I've been doing stuff along the lines of #2, for HTTP-based
automated file transfer apps.
Received on Sunday, 10 November 1996 12:05:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:59 UTC